ISLAMABAD – The Chief Royal household of Pakistan has resumed sense of hearing a slew of petitions seeking a test into Panama Leaks here on Thursday.
Maryam Nawaz’s interchange of opinion Shahid Hamid is arguing before the larger seat, refuting any connective of offshore firms and London flats to Maryam Nawaz Sharif.
The Sharif parents and children submitted another alphabetic character from Qatari ruler in rejoinder to the questions posed after the first alphabetic character.
The second alphabetic character contains half face of Qatari ruler Hammad Bunker Jasim Al-Thani and states that Mian Shareef made an investing invest of Rs. 12 a thousand thousand in 1980 and the investments was in the conformation of coin.
It also suggests that the Sharif parents and children locate up Dubai carburet of iron mills after pecuniary bear up from banks and Dubai conduct.
An testimony by Tariq Shafi outlining how the AED 12 a thousand thousand were deposited with Mr. Fahad bunker Jassim bunker Jaber Al Thani of Qatar on instructions of his uncle Mian Muhammad Sharif was also presneted.
Meanwhile, the interchange of opinion for Hassan and Hussain Nawaz submitted their replies before the Chief Royal household.
On the other palm and fingers, Shahid Hamid kicked off his arguments by expressing that there was no limpid wound (with a cutting instrument) explanation for ‘dependence’. He maintained that somewhat old and unoccupied clan can be included in the explanation of dependents.
He also submitted an meeting of Maryam Nawaz before the larger seat and claimed that any connubial woman existing with her parents would be considered in the sway of appurtenance.
Equity Ijaz Ul Ahsan remarked that in 2011 tribute returns Maryam Nawaz was clearly represented as a pendent.
Presiding officer PTI Imran Cham arrives at Chief ROYAL HOUSEHOLD
Presiding officer PTI Imran Cham arrives at Chief Royal household
Shahid went on and asserted that any single woman would be pendent if she had no origin of gains.
He reiterated that the egress of appurtenance could only be dealt sheathe to sheathe.
Equity Aijaz Afzal said that the LAY HOLD ON laws also failed to bound appurtenance egress.
Equity Asif Khosa while constraining further regarding appurtenance observed that for a well-established avocation parents and children, a sole individual is the strongest one.
He inquired whether the summit royal household couls cite that particular strongest living soul regarding the Panama sheathe.
Meanwhile the summit royal household asked Sharif parents and children to not away particulars regarding the trade of gifts.
During the last sense of hearing, Shahid Hamid, interchange of opinion for Maryam Nawaz Sharif argued before the larger seat regarding the ownership of offshore companies and London flats.
Shahid kicked off his arguments by expressing that the first minister presented himself for liability before the summit royal household and for disability of any lawmaker, a writing suit for co-warranto could be filed.
He claimed that a limb of public Rout could not be disqualified on the foundation of not filing tribute returns as FBR was the capable dominion regarding Tribute paying.
He reiterated that Maryam Nawaz was not possessor of any quality adding that Hussain Nawaz was the that exists in exploit and in truth possessor of London flats.
‘Capt. Safdar did not rasp tribute go or come back in 2011’ said equity Azmat Saeed.
Shahid Hamid expressed that Nawaz Sharif in his nomination papers categorically confirmed that he lived with her female parent in her abode.
Shahid Hamid maintained that there was no contend in argument among members of Sharif parents and children regarding quality arrangement after the exit of Mian Sharif.
Meanwhile, Chief Royal household sought quality arrangement particulars after Mian Sharif’s exit.
Shahid hamid claimed that the paper linking Maryam Nawaz to offshore dense perforate a fake mark of first minister’s daughter.
Giving remarks on Maryam Nawaz’s signatures, Equity Ejaz Afzal said that an ready can remark on this egress as judges are not learning masters.
Equity Gulzar observed that evidently, there was a variation in the signatures.
‘Maryam Nawaz’s mark is also not away on her private advice conformation issued by Between nations Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)’ remarked equity Khosa.
Meanwhile, Equity Ejaz asked the complainant’s limb of the law to confirm from where the documents connected to Maryam Nawaz were taken.
He further said that such documents cannot be accepted without authentication.
The summit royal household also sought the transcription of Maryam Nawaz which she gave to a ruling television duct.
Equity Asif Khosa remarked that the reliance exploit inked between members of Sharif parents and children harked back to 2006 whereas equity Gulzar Ahmed remarked that Maryam admitted existing with his male parent.
In his remarks Equity Ijaz ul Ahsan remarked that Maryam Nawaz is accused of being Nawaz Sharif’s frontman.
To this Maryam Nawaz’s interchange of opinion Shahid Hamid said that this averment has to be proven by the applicant.
Maryam Nawaz’s interchange of opinion Shahid Hamid is arguing before the larger seat, refuting any connective of offshore firms and London flats to Maryam Nawaz Sharif.
The Sharif parents and children submitted another alphabetic character from Qatari ruler in rejoinder to the questions posed after the first alphabetic character.
The second alphabetic character contains half face of Qatari ruler Hammad Bunker Jasim Al-Thani and states that Mian Shareef made an investing invest of Rs. 12 a thousand thousand in 1980 and the investments was in the conformation of coin.
It also suggests that the Sharif parents and children locate up Dubai carburet of iron mills after pecuniary bear up from banks and Dubai conduct.
An testimony by Tariq Shafi outlining how the AED 12 a thousand thousand were deposited with Mr. Fahad bunker Jassim bunker Jaber Al Thani of Qatar on instructions of his uncle Mian Muhammad Sharif was also presneted.
Meanwhile, the interchange of opinion for Hassan and Hussain Nawaz submitted their replies before the Chief Royal household.
On the other palm and fingers, Shahid Hamid kicked off his arguments by expressing that there was no limpid wound (with a cutting instrument) explanation for ‘dependence’. He maintained that somewhat old and unoccupied clan can be included in the explanation of dependents.
He also submitted an meeting of Maryam Nawaz before the larger seat and claimed that any connubial woman existing with her parents would be considered in the sway of appurtenance.
Equity Ijaz Ul Ahsan remarked that in 2011 tribute returns Maryam Nawaz was clearly represented as a pendent.
Presiding officer PTI Imran Cham arrives at Chief ROYAL HOUSEHOLD
Presiding officer PTI Imran Cham arrives at Chief Royal household
Shahid went on and asserted that any single woman would be pendent if she had no origin of gains.
He reiterated that the egress of appurtenance could only be dealt sheathe to sheathe.
Equity Aijaz Afzal said that the LAY HOLD ON laws also failed to bound appurtenance egress.
Equity Asif Khosa while constraining further regarding appurtenance observed that for a well-established avocation parents and children, a sole individual is the strongest one.
He inquired whether the summit royal household couls cite that particular strongest living soul regarding the Panama sheathe.
Meanwhile the summit royal household asked Sharif parents and children to not away particulars regarding the trade of gifts.
During the last sense of hearing, Shahid Hamid, interchange of opinion for Maryam Nawaz Sharif argued before the larger seat regarding the ownership of offshore companies and London flats.
Shahid kicked off his arguments by expressing that the first minister presented himself for liability before the summit royal household and for disability of any lawmaker, a writing suit for co-warranto could be filed.
He claimed that a limb of public Rout could not be disqualified on the foundation of not filing tribute returns as FBR was the capable dominion regarding Tribute paying.
He reiterated that Maryam Nawaz was not possessor of any quality adding that Hussain Nawaz was the that exists in exploit and in truth possessor of London flats.
‘Capt. Safdar did not rasp tribute go or come back in 2011’ said equity Azmat Saeed.
Shahid Hamid expressed that Nawaz Sharif in his nomination papers categorically confirmed that he lived with her female parent in her abode.
Shahid Hamid maintained that there was no contend in argument among members of Sharif parents and children regarding quality arrangement after the exit of Mian Sharif.
Meanwhile, Chief Royal household sought quality arrangement particulars after Mian Sharif’s exit.
Shahid hamid claimed that the paper linking Maryam Nawaz to offshore dense perforate a fake mark of first minister’s daughter.
Giving remarks on Maryam Nawaz’s signatures, Equity Ejaz Afzal said that an ready can remark on this egress as judges are not learning masters.
Equity Gulzar observed that evidently, there was a variation in the signatures.
‘Maryam Nawaz’s mark is also not away on her private advice conformation issued by Between nations Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)’ remarked equity Khosa.
Meanwhile, Equity Ejaz asked the complainant’s limb of the law to confirm from where the documents connected to Maryam Nawaz were taken.
He further said that such documents cannot be accepted without authentication.
The summit royal household also sought the transcription of Maryam Nawaz which she gave to a ruling television duct.
Equity Asif Khosa remarked that the reliance exploit inked between members of Sharif parents and children harked back to 2006 whereas equity Gulzar Ahmed remarked that Maryam admitted existing with his male parent.
In his remarks Equity Ijaz ul Ahsan remarked that Maryam Nawaz is accused of being Nawaz Sharif’s frontman.
To this Maryam Nawaz’s interchange of opinion Shahid Hamid said that this averment has to be proven by the applicant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment